Manufacturing is important for obtaining key components and products on time, enhancing wealth and quality of life. 3D printing also called additive manufacturing (AM) is a unique process that builds products layer by layer, unlike traditional methods that remove material. Recently, AM has gained attention for its creative flexibility and faster production times. This research draws comparisons between samples made via additive manufacturing technique and how Cr2O3 and TiO2 coatings affect these samples. SEM analysis is utilized to assess how the coatings influence the performance of these stainless-steel components. The focus of the study is on the microstructure and wear characteristics of Cr2O3 and TiO2 coatings on 17-4 PH Stainless Steel. Macro Hardness test is also conducted on Cr2O3 and TiO2 coatings, comparing the results with uncoated samples. Wear tests were performed using a pin-on-disc tribometer, with pins that featured various coatings SEM techniques were applied to examine the microstructure of the material and the mechanisms behind wear. The application of Cr2O3 and TiO2 coatings has demonstrated a notable improvement in these properties. The observed wear resistance showed significant differences due to the varied coatings on the pins. This study offers valuable insights into enhancing the durability of stainless-steel components for challenging environments.
Introduction
1. Modern Manufacturing Trends
Manufacturing is evolving from traditional material processing to machine-based and smart systems operations.
Key features: customization, complexity, and volume.
3D printing (Additive Manufacturing - AM) enhances efficiency, reduces material waste, and is ideal for custom, low-volume production.
2. Additive Manufacturing Techniques
Different AM techniques (e.g., SLM, FDM, DED, Inkjet) use materials like metals, polymers, and ceramics for industries such as aerospace, biomedical, and construction. Benefits include:
High-quality resolution
Reduced tooling and manufacturing time
Capability to print complex and large structures
3. Material Focus: 17-4 PH Stainless Steel
A martensitic precipitation-hardened steel with 17% Cr, 4% Ni, and copper (hardener).
Transforms from austenite to martensite at around 300°F.
Used in high-performance applications for its strength and corrosion resistance.
4. Protective Coatings
Thermal spray coatings, such as plasma spraying, improve wear resistance, oxidation, and corrosion protection.
Coatings like TiO? (titanium oxide) and Cr?O? (chromium oxide) are applied using high-temperature plasma jets.
These coatings enhance mechanical, thermal, and chemical performance.
5. Experimentation Methods
Sample preparation: 17-4PH stainless steel specimens were produced using Selective Laser Melting (SLM).
Coating deposition: Plasma-sprayed TiO? and Cr?O? coatings applied after grit blasting and cleaning.
Testing methods:
SEM + EDS: Analyzed surface and composition.
Hardness Test: Rockwell scale.
Wear Test: Assessed durability under friction.
6. Process Parameters
SLM process used:
Laser Power: 105 W
Scan Speed: 2500 mm/s
Layer Thickness: 30 µm
Hatch Spacing: 50 µm
Plasma spray coating settings included:
Power: 35.6 kW
Argon/H?/N? gas flow, 110 mm standoff distance
7. Results
Hardness (Rockwell HRC):
Uncoated: 68.8 HRC
Cr?O?-coated: 75.4 HRC
TiO?-coated: 72.1 HRC
SEM/EDS revealed proper coating adhesion and composition. "Splats" typical of plasma-sprayed coatings were visible.
Coatings significantly improved surface hardness and wear resistance.
Conclusion
1) 17-4 PH stainless steel fabricated through Additive Manufacturing show considerable promise as substitutes for wrought materials concerning friction and wear characteristics.
2) Both the coated steels showed higher wear resistance in comparison to the uncoated steel. Plasma-sprayed Cr2O3 coatings showed a reduced coefficient of friction (COF), lesser wear loss, and a heightened wear resistance compared to TiO2 coating.
3) Elements like material hardness, surface finish, and lubrication play a crucial role in determining wear rates, emphasizing the need to comprehend these dynamics for material choice and component design in applications where wear is a significant factor.
References
[1] Pereiraa T. , Kennedyb J., Potgieter J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019(30) , pp 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003.
[2] N. Shahrubudina, T.C. Leea,*, R. Ramlana. An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019 (35), pp 1286-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
[3] Zeng Z., Salehi M., Kopp A., Xu S., Esmaily M., Birbilis N. Recent progress and perspectives in additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys. 2022 (10), pp – 1511-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2022.03.001.
[4] Mercado Rivera, F.J., Rojas Arciniegas, A.J. Additive manufacturing methods: techniques, materials, and closed-loop control applications. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Technology. 2020(109), pp. 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05663-6.
[5] Kazior J., Nykiel S., Aneta & Pieczonka T. , Nykiel, M. Properties of precipitation hardening 17-4 PH stainless steel manufactured by powder metallurgy technology. Advanced Materials Research. 2013 (811). pp. 87-92.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.811.87.
[6] Panchal, Hemant & Amin, Sagar. A Review on Thermal Spray Coating Processes. International Journal of Current Trends in Engineering & Research (IJCTER). 2016 (2). pp 556-563.
[7] Adawiyah J. Haider, Zainab N. Jameel, Imad H. M. Al-Hussainib. Review on: Titanium dioxide. Energy Procedia. 2019(157).pp 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.159.
[8] Gunjan C., Bala N., Dhami S.S. Experimental investigations on wear and mechanical properties of post heat treated AM 17-4 PH SS Parts. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 2023 (11). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.54368.
[9] Mahltig B, Grethe T. High-Performance and Functional Fiber Materials—A Review of Properties, Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM and Electron Dispersive Spectroscopy EDS. Textiles. 2022 (2). pp 209-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2020012.
[10] Organek P., Gosowski B., Redecki M. Relationship between Brinell hardness and the strength of structural steels. Structures.2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105701.
[11] Bressan J.D, Daros D.P., Sokolowski A., Mesquita R.A., Barbosa C.A. Influence of hardness on the wear resistance of 17-4 PH stainless steel evaluated by the pin-on-disc testing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2008 (205). pp 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.251.
[12] Guilherme S., Birbilis, Nick & Tan, Jess & Balan, Poo & Gharbi, Oumaïma & Feenstra, Darren & Thomas, Sebastian & Kelly, R. & Hutchinson, Christopher & Scully, John. Corrosion of Additively Manufactured Alloys: A Review. Corrosion. 2018 (74). https://doi.org/10.5006/2926.
[13] Jiang X, Lu J, Zhao N, Chen Z, Zhao Z. A Review of Wear in Additive Manufacturing: Wear Mechanism, Materials, and Process. Lubricants. 2024; 2024(9). pp 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12090321
[14] Huang R., Zhao H., Sun Y., Lin D., Tang Z., Chen B., Song X., Tan C. Additive manufacturing of 17-4PH stainless steel: Effect of heat treatment on microstructure evolution and strengthening behaviour. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2024 (908). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2024.146770.
[15] Bagde, Pranay and Sapate, S G and Khatirkar, R K and Vashishtha, Nitesh and Tailor, Satish. Friction and wear behaviour of plasma sprayed Cr2O3-TiO2 coating. 2018(5). pp 26410.https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaacf4.